You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stakeholders' views and opinions on existing guidelines on “How to Choose Mental Health Apps”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1251050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wishah Khan, Bertina Jebanesan, Sarah Ahmed, Chris Trimmer, Branka Agic, Farhana Safa, Aamna Ashraf, Andrew Tuck, Kelsey Kavic, Sapna Wadhawan, Maureen Abbott, Omair Husain, Ishrat Husain, Muhammad Akhter Hamid, Kwame McKenzie, Yuri Quintana, Farooq Naeem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,275,571
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,627
of 14,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,593
of 349,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#114
of 764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.