You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Otorhinolaryngologic complications after COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1338862 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jieun Shin, Sung Ryul Shim, Jaekwang Lee, Hyon Shik Ryu, Jong-Yeup Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 11 | 21% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 96% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,108,421
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#582
of 14,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,611
of 361,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#19
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.