You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How has research on the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination been evaluated: a scope review with emphasis on CoronaVac
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321327 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan C. Alzate-Ángel, Paula A. Avilés-Vergara, David Arango-Londoño, Alberto Concha-Eastman, Anthony Garcés-Hurtado, Liliana López-Carvajal, Ingrid L. Minotta, Delia Ortega-Lenis, Geraldine Quintero, Sebastián Reina-Bolaños, Carlos A. Reina-Bolaños, Pablo Roa, Melanie Sánchez-Orozco, Catalina Tovar-Acero, María P. Arbeláez-Montoya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,458,229
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,537
of 14,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,776
of 221,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#73
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.