You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An innovative Indigenous-led model for integrated COVID-19 case management in Auckland, New Zealand: lessons from implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324239 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elana Curtis, Belinda Loring, Kadin Latham, Anthony Jordan, Nigel Chee, Rangimarie Hunia, Karl Snowden, Kerry Tari, Paora Murupaenga, Roimata Tipene, Stevie Whitcombe, Kelleigh Embers, Rawiri McKree Jansen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,730,204
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#9,722
of 13,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,330
of 170,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#149
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.