↓ Skip to main content

Toward More Inclusive Metrics and Open Science to Measure Research Assessment in Earth and Natural Sciences

Overview of attention for article published in Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 361)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
56 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward More Inclusive Metrics and Open Science to Measure Research Assessment in Earth and Natural Sciences
Published in
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), March 2022
DOI 10.3389/frma.2022.850333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Pourret, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Najmeh Shaghaei, Elenora M. van Rijsingen, Lonni Besançon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 33%
Mathematics 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Other 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#842,509
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#18
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,302
of 446,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.