↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Data science and artificial intelligence for (better) science

Overview of attention for article published in Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Data science and artificial intelligence for (better) science
Published in
Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA), April 2023
DOI 10.3389/frma.2023.1177903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Claude Burgelman, Kuansan Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#17,672,917
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#266
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,163
of 416,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Metrics and Analytics (RMA)
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.