You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploration Behaviors, Body Representations, and Simulation Processes for the Development of Cognition in Artificial Agents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2016.00039 |
| Authors |
Guido Schillaci, Verena V. Hafner, Bruno Lara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 23 | 32% |
| Engineering | 15 | 21% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,209,400
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#220
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,777
of 351,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.