↓ Skip to main content

Immersive Analytics: Theory and Research Agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immersive Analytics: Theory and Research Agenda
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2019.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Skarbez, Nicholas F. Polys, J. Todd Ogle, Chris North, Doug A. Bowman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 39 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 42 34%
Engineering 14 11%
Design 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,247,305
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#215
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,515
of 351,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.