You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparison of Immersive Realities and Interaction Methods: Cultural Learning in Virtual Heritage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2019.00091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mafkereseb Kassahun Bekele, Erik Champion |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Greece | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 31 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 24 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Design | 16 | 7% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#949,596
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#66
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,207
of 360,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.