You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robotic systems for upper-limb rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a SWOT analysis and the synergies with virtual and augmented environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2024.1335147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia A. Albanese, Anna Bucchieri, Jessica Podda, Andrea Tacchino, Stefano Buccelli, Elena De Momi, Matteo Laffranchi, Kailynn Mannella, Michael W. R. Holmes, Jacopo Zenzeri, Lorenzo De Michieli, Giampaolo Brichetto, Giacinto Barresi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,969,398
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1,261
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,984
of 164,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.