↓ Skip to main content

Indeterminate Lesions of the Testis in Klinefelter Syndrome—Should We Be Concerned?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Reproductive Health, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indeterminate Lesions of the Testis in Klinefelter Syndrome—Should We Be Concerned?
Published in
Frontiers in Reproductive Health, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/frph.2021.629418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aneirin Rhys Potter, Davide Prezzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,025,659
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#118
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,577
of 443,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#19
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.