You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Explaining the Black-White Disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement From a Multi-Disciplinary Scientific Work Group Convened by the March of Dimes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frph.2021.684207 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula Braveman, Tyan Parker Dominguez, Wylie Burke, Siobhan M. Dolan, David K. Stevenson, Fleda Mask Jackson, James W. Collins, Deborah A. Driscoll, Terinney Haley, Julia Acker, Gary M. Shaw, Edward R. B. McCabe, William W. Hay, Kent Thornburg, Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, José F. Cordero, Paul H. Wise, Gina Legaz, Kweli Rashied-Henry, Jordana Frost, Sarah Verbiest, Lisa Waddell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 76% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 59 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#174,981
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#2
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,817
of 436,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.