↓ Skip to main content

Mineralisation of CO2 in wood biomass ash for cement substitution in construction products

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sustainability, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mineralisation of CO2 in wood biomass ash for cement substitution in construction products
Published in
Frontiers in Sustainability, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/frsus.2024.1287543
Authors

Nimisha Tripathi, Colin D. Hills, Raj S. Singh, Stephen Kyeremeh, Andrew Hurt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,599,312
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainability
#230
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,894
of 144,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainability
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.