↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a point-of-use device used for autoantibody analysis and its potential for following microcystin leucine-arginine exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sensors, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a point-of-use device used for autoantibody analysis and its potential for following microcystin leucine-arginine exposure
Published in
Frontiers in Sensors, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsens.2024.1302520
Authors

Hui Ma, Christine Loscher, Anne Parle-McDermott, Jenny Fitzgerald, Julie Meneely, Christopher Elliott, Richard Welten, Geofrey J. Mchau, Edna Makule, Revocatus Machunda, Yun Yun Gong, Martin Kimanya, Aoife Crawley, Ivan Maguire, Caroline Murphy, Richard O’Kennedy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,089,475
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sensors
#30
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,818
of 319,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sensors
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them