↓ Skip to main content

Invisibility of Racism in the Global Neoliberal Era: Implications for Researching Racism in Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sociology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invisibility of Racism in the Global Neoliberal Era: Implications for Researching Racism in Healthcare
Published in
Frontiers in Sociology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth Maina Ahlberg, Sarah Hamed, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, Hannah Bradby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 6 9%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,232,739
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sociology
#62
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,416
of 355,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sociology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.