You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Invisibility of Racism in the Global Neoliberal Era: Implications for Researching Racism in Healthcare
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Sociology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00061 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Beth Maina Ahlberg, Sarah Hamed, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, Hannah Bradby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 9% |
Switzerland | 3 | 7% |
India | 2 | 5% |
Nigeria | 2 | 5% |
South Africa | 2 | 5% |
Brazil | 2 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Ghana | 1 | 2% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 26% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 79% |
Scientists | 6 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Psychology | 6 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,232,739
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sociology
#62
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,416
of 355,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sociology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.