↓ Skip to main content

Funding employment inclusion for Ontario youth with disabilities: a theoretical cost-benefit model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sociology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Funding employment inclusion for Ontario youth with disabilities: a theoretical cost-benefit model
Published in
Frontiers in Sociology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1281088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura R. Bowman, Carolyn McDougall, René Doucet, Brendon Pooran, Ying Xu, Jeannette Campbell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#14,762,368
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sociology
#496
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,782
of 229,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sociology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.