↓ Skip to main content

The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Discrepancy Between Simulation and Observation of Electric Fields in Collisionless Shocks
Published in
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fspas.2020.592634
Authors

Lynn B. Wilson, Li-Jen Chen, Vadim Roytershteyn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 64%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,119,559
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#580
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,338
of 505,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#20
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.