↓ Skip to main content

From Coronal Holes to Pulsars and Back Again: Learning the Importance of Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Coronal Holes to Pulsars and Back Again: Learning the Importance of Data
Published in
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fspas.2022.898837
Authors

Y.-M. Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,897,807
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#356
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,582
of 429,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#32
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.