↓ Skip to main content

Using machine learning to characterize solar wind driving of convection in the terrestrial magnetotail lobes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using machine learning to characterize solar wind driving of convection in the terrestrial magnetotail lobes
Published in
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fspas.2023.1180410
Authors

Xin Cao, Jasper S. Halekas, Stein Haaland, Suranga Ruhunusiri, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,745,083
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#868
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,163
of 169,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.