↓ Skip to main content

A feasibility study of 4-D tomography of soft X-ray magnetosheath emissivities using multi-spacecraft measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A feasibility study of 4-D tomography of soft X-ray magnetosheath emissivities using multi-spacecraft measurements
Published in
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fspas.2024.1379321
Authors

Gonzalo Cucho-Padin, Hyunju Connor, Jaewoong Jung, Michael Shoemaker, Kyle Murphy, David Sibeck, Johannes Norberg, Enrique Rojas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#659
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,432
of 142,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.