↓ Skip to main content

Retroperitoneal Tumors in the Pelvis: A Diagnostic Challenge in Gynecology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retroperitoneal Tumors in the Pelvis: A Diagnostic Challenge in Gynecology
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei-Wei Wee-Stekly, Michael David Mueller

Abstract

Retroperitoneal tumors can pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to gynecologists because of their rarity, late presentation, and complex anatomical location in the retroperitoneum. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal tumors in the pelvis, and highlights the potential pitfalls that may be faced by gynecologists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 24%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#914
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,671
of 359,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.