You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guoyan Zheng, Lutz P. Nolte |
| Abstract |
Introduced about two decades ago, computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) has emerged as a new and independent area, due to the importance of treatment of musculoskeletal diseases in orthopedics and traumatology, increasing availability of different imaging modalities, and advances in analytics and navigation tools. The aim of this paper is to present the basic elements of CAOS devices and to review state-of-the-art examples of different imaging modalities used to create the virtual representations, of different position tracking devices for navigation systems, of different surgical robots, of different methods for registration and referencing, and of CAOS modules that have been realized for different surgical procedures. Future perspectives will also be outlined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 46 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,225,144
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#251
of 2,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,333
of 390,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.