You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune Evasion Strategies of Glioblastoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seyed-Mostafa Razavi, Karen E. Lee, Benjamin E. Jin, Parvir S. Aujla, Sharareh Gholamin, Gordon Li |
| Abstract |
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most devastating brain tumor, with associated poor prognosis. Despite advances in surgery and chemoradiation, the survival of afflicted patients has not improved significantly in the past three decades. Immunotherapy has been heralded as a promising approach in treatment of various cancers; however, the immune privileged environment of the brain usually curbs the optimal expected response in central nervous system malignancies. In addition, GBM cells create an immunosuppressive microenvironment and employ various methods to escape immune surveillance. The purpose of this review is to highlight the strategies by which GBM cells evade the host immune system. Further understanding of these strategies and the biology of this tumor will pave the way for developing novel immunotherapeutic approaches for treatment of GBM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 340 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 113 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#209,921
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#9
of 3,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,916
of 301,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.