↓ Skip to main content

The Case for Using Evidence-Based Guidelines in Setting Hospital and Public Health Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Case for Using Evidence-Based Guidelines in Setting Hospital and Public Health Policy
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross H. Francis, Jordan A. Mudery, Phi Tran, Carol Howe, Abraham Jacob

Abstract

Hospital systems and regulating agencies enforce strict guidelines barring personal items from entering the operating room (OR) - touting surgical site infections (SSIs) and patient safety as the rationale. We sought to determine whether or not evidence supporting this recommendation exists by reviewing available literature. Rules and guidelines that are not evidence based may lead to increased hospital expenses and limitations on healthcare provider autonomy. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched in order to find articles that correlated personal items in the OR to documented SSIs. Articles that satisfied the following criteria were included: (1) studies looking at personal items in the OR, such as handbags, purses, badges, pagers, backpacks, jewelry phones, and eyeglasses, but not just OR equipment; and (2) the primary outcome measure was infection at the surgical site. Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Of the 17, the majority did not determine if personal items increased risk for SSIs. Only one article examined the correlation between a personal item near the operative site and SSI, concluding that wedding rings worn in the OR had no impact on SSIs. Most studies examined colonization rates on personal items as potential infection risk; however, no personal items were causally linked to SSI in any of these studies. There is no objective evidence to suggest that personal items in the OR increase risk for SSIs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Other 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,283,415
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#211
of 2,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,483
of 301,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.