↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous Hepatic and Mesenteric Hydatid Disease—A Case Report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous Hepatic and Mesenteric Hydatid Disease—A Case Report
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Paramythiotis, Anestis Karakatsanis, Petros Bangeas, Konstantinia Kofina, Vassileios Papadopoulos, Stylianos Apostolidis, Antonios Michalopoulos

Abstract

Hydatid cysts most commonly present in the liver and the lungs; however, they can appear more rarely in other locations, such as the mesentery, with a rather unclear mechanism of manifestation. Herein, we present a case of simultaneous presence of hydatid cysts in the liver and the mesentery of a young man. A 39-year-old man was referred to our Department for further investigation of intermittent abdominal pain, especially in the right upper quadrant, and abdominal distension. Abdominal CT imaging revealed three calcified lesions, one in the liver, a similar adjacent to an ileal loop and one close to the urinary bladder, while antibody control was positive for echinococcal infection. The lesions were excised and the patient was discharged on the seventh post-operative day in good general condition. Post-operative control after 6 months did not show any signs of recurrence. Simultaneous presence of hydatid cysts in two organs occurs in 5-13% of cases. Presence in the mesentery is extremely rare, although, should be included in the classic differential diagnosis, especially in endemic areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#946
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,441
of 437,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.