↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the PILL-5: A 5-Item Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Pill Dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the PILL-5: A 5-Item Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Pill Dysphagia
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer, Ahmed Bayoumi, Van Pierre Mandin, Matthew Kaufman, Indulaxmi Seeni, Maggie A Kuhn, Peter C Belafsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#12,921,879
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#302
of 2,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,158
of 345,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.