↓ Skip to main content

The Surgeon's Role in the Opioid Crisis: A Narrative Review and Call to Action

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Surgeon's Role in the Opioid Crisis: A Narrative Review and Call to Action
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cade Shadbolt, J. Haxby Abbott, Ximena Camacho, Philip Clarke, L. Stefan Lohmander, Tim Spelman, Eric C. Sun, Jonas B. Thorlund, Yuting Zhang, Michelle M. Dowsey, Peter F. M. Choong

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been a sharp rise in the use of prescription opioids. In several countries, most notably the United States, opioid-related harm has been deemed a public health crisis. As surgeons are among the most prolific prescribers of opioids, growing attention is now being paid to the role that opioids play in surgical care. While opioids may sometimes be necessary to provide patients with adequate relief from acute pain after major surgery, the impact of opioids on the quality and safety of surgical care calls for greater scrutiny. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence on rates of persistent postsurgical opioid use and highlights the need to target known risk factors for persistent postoperative use before patients present for surgery. We draw attention to the mounting evidence that preoperative opioid exposure places patients at risk of persistent postoperative use, while also contributing to an increased risk of several other adverse clinical outcomes. By discussing the prevalence of excess opioid prescribing following surgery and highlighting significant variations in prescribing practices between countries, we note that there is a pressing need to optimize postoperative prescribing practices. Guided by the available evidence, we call for specific actions to be taken to address important research gaps and alleviate the harms associated with opioid use among surgical patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,815,477
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#74
of 3,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,042
of 360,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.