You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Preservation Surgery With Hydroxyapatite-Coated Abutments Compared to Traditional Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Surgery—A Pragmatic Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. van Hoof, S. Wigren, J. Ivarsson Blechert, M. A. Joore, D. J. M. Mateijsen, S. J. H. Bom, J. Stalfors, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, O. Deguine, A. J. M. van der Rijt, M. C. Flynn, J. Marco Algarra, R. J. Stokroos, The Angelfish Collaborative |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,158,693
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#550
of 3,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,992
of 362,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.