↓ Skip to main content

Treatment outcomes of mucosal melanoma of head and neck: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment outcomes of mucosal melanoma of head and neck: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced disease
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1032626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shusuke Ohshima, Yushi Ueki, Yusuke Yokoyama, Takeshi Takahashi, Ryusuke Shodo, Keisuke Yamazaki, Ryuichi Okabe, Hiroshi Matsuyama, Takafumi Togashi, Sumiko Takatsuka, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Arata Horii

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,422,901
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,156
of 3,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,338
of 475,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#77
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.