↓ Skip to main content

Robotic versus open extended cholecystectomy for T1a–T3 gallbladder cancer: A matched comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic versus open extended cholecystectomy for T1a–T3 gallbladder cancer: A matched comparison
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1039828
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Yang, Enliang Li, Cong Wang, Shuaiwu Luo, Zixuan Fu, Jiandong Peng, Wenjun Liao, Linquan Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,324,560
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,129
of 3,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,563
of 435,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#86
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.