↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Different Surgical Procedures: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicentric Study (ROBOCOSTES)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Different Surgical Procedures: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicentric Study (ROBOCOSTES)
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedetto Ielpo, Mauro Podda, Fernando Burdio, Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez, Maria-Alejandra Guerrero, Javier Nuñez, Miguel Toledano, Salvador Morales-Conde, Julio Mayol, Manuel Lopez-Cano, Eloy Espín-Basany, Gianluca Pellino, The ROBOCOSTES Study Collaborators, Dulce Momblan, Sandra Castro Boix, Esteban Cugat, pardo, Marcel Pujadas, Rosa Jorba, Juan Bellido Luque, Carmen Cagigas, Jacobo Trebol, Juan Carlos Martín del Olmo, Helena Álvarez García, José Herreros Rodríguez, Silva Fernández, Luis Sanchez Guillen, José Francisco Noguera Aguilar, Raquel Sánchez Santos, Juan José Segura Sampedro, Ma Asuncion Acosta Mérdia, Iván Jesús Arteaga González, Irene Ortega Vázquez, Mario Álvarez Gallego, Emilio Vicente, Sagrario Martinez Cortijo, Sergio Pedro Olivares Pizarro, David Fernandez Luengas, David Alías Jiménez, Carolina González-Abós, Amaia Gantxegi, Clara Codony Bassols, Isaias Alarcon del Agua, Carlos Rafael Díaz Maag, Aroa Abascal Amo, Carlos Jezieniecki Fernández, David Pacheco Sánchez, Julián García Orozco, Beatriz Guil Ortiz, Manuel Alberto Lasaia, Raquel Ríos, Jorge Zárate Gómez, Gustavo Díaz García, Víctor Rodrígues, Guillermo Ais Conde, Esther Ferrero Celemín, Santiago Linacero, Miguel Josa, Marta Pascual, Miquel Kraft Carré, Pere Planellas Giné, Javier Sánchez González, Alberto Rojo López, Rita Medina Quintana, Ana Pilar Morante, Fabio Ausania, Elisabeth Pando, Santiago López-Ben, Ángel Cuadrado García, José Antonio Pereira, Alex Bravo, Juan Beltrán de Heredia Rentería, Daniel Sánchez López, Anna Casajoana, Ramón Vilallonga Puy, Luis García Sancho, María Hernández O‘Reilly, and José María Gil López

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Unspecified 2 9%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,204,664
of 24,667,989 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#90
of 3,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,771
of 433,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,667,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.