You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative efficacy of radiofrequency denervation in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.899538 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Han Li, Junyan An, Jun Zhang, Weijian Kong, Zhihe Yun, Tong Yu, Xinyu Nie, Qinyi Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#19,039,541
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#867
of 3,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,182
of 420,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#100
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.