↓ Skip to main content

Case Report: Hemodynamic Instability Caused by Splenic Rupture During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case Report: Hemodynamic Instability Caused by Splenic Rupture During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.900396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun-tong Liu, Ting-ting Wu, Yun-ying Ding, Jin-long Lin, Shuang Zhou, Hong Liu, Fu-hai Ji, Ke Peng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#979
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,536
of 441,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#160
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.