↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous endoscopic drainage for acute long segment epidural abscess following endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous endoscopic drainage for acute long segment epidural abscess following endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.985666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Li, Hui Wu, Jinghong Yuan, Jingyu Jia, Tianlong Wu, Xigao Cheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,145,216
of 24,762,960 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,104
of 3,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,702
of 430,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#109
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,762,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.