↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for duodenal leaks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for duodenal leaks
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1099457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dörte Wichmann, Dietmar Stüker, Ulrich Schweizer, Moritz Senne, Benedikt Duckworth-Mothes, Emanuel Zerabruck, Alfred Königsrainer, Jeannine Bachmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#20,201,522
of 24,835,287 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,115
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,733
of 398,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#52
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,835,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.