↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of humeral osteotomies versus soft-tissue procedures in secondary surgical procedures for neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes of humeral osteotomies versus soft-tissue procedures in secondary surgical procedures for neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1267064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Azer, Dhruv Mendiratta, Anthony Saad, Yajie Duan, Matthew Cedarstrand, Sree Chinta, Aedan Hanna, Dhvani Shihora, Aleksandra McGrath, Alice Chu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#22,737,191
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#2,338
of 3,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,018
of 341,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#83
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,930 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.