↓ Skip to main content

Comparing trimodal therapy with radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing trimodal therapy with radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1276746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad R. Al-Qudimat, Kalpana Singh, Laxmi K. Ojha, Diala Alhaj Moustafa, Mai Elaarag, Raed M. Al-Zoubi, Omar M. Aboumarzouk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,719,832
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#655
of 3,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,885
of 344,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#11
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,936 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.