↓ Skip to main content

Rare adrenal cavernous hemangioma: a case report highlighting diagnostic challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare adrenal cavernous hemangioma: a case report highlighting diagnostic challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293925
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Michael Antar, Christian Mark Farag, Kirolos Youssef, Vincent Xu, Arthur Drouaud, Noah Panitch, Zoon Tariq, Ali Alzeer, Michael J. Whalen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,734,330
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#655
of 3,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,043
of 353,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#10
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.