↓ Skip to main content

Case Report: Modified Taulinoplasty: a new technique for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case Report: Modified Taulinoplasty: a new technique for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1343515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Frediani, Federico Beati, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Simone Reali, Paolo Maria Salvatore Schingo, Alessandro Inserra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,098,255
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#651
of 4,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,792
of 361,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#10
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,015 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.