↓ Skip to main content

Leiomyoma of the fallopian tube found during laparoscopic myomectomy: A case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leiomyoma of the fallopian tube found during laparoscopic myomectomy: A case report and review of the literature
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.997338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bing Cheng, Rui Wang, Yaoqun Fu, Xi Fu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#20,133,678
of 24,746,716 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,099
of 3,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,069
of 407,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#57
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,746,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.