You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Faecal incontinence—a comprehensive review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1340720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eloise Dexter, Josephine Walshaw, Hannah Wynn, Safaa Dimashki, Alex Leo, Ian Lindsey, Marina Yiasemidou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 8% |
| Turkey | 1 | 8% |
| Honduras | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,374,859
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#163
of 4,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,467
of 341,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#1
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.