You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building an Adverse Outcome Pathway network for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Biology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsysb.2024.1384481 |
| Authors |
Penny Nymark, Laure-Alix Clerbaux, Maria-João Amorim, Christos Andronis, Francesca de Bernardi, Gillina F. G. Bezemer, Sandra Coecke, Felicity N. E. Gavins, Daniel Jacobson, Eftychia Lekka, Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci, Marvin Martens, Sally A. Mayasich, Holly M. Mortensen, Young Jun Kim, Magdalini Sachana, Shihori Tanabe, Vassilis Virvilis, Stephen W. Edwards, Sabina Halappanavar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#20,537,408
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#79
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,919
of 159,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Biology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.