↓ Skip to main content

The Gut Microbiome and Its Potential Role in the Development and Function of Newborn Calf Gastrointestinal Tract

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Gut Microbiome and Its Potential Role in the Development and Function of Newborn Calf Gastrointestinal Tract
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2015.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilusha Malmuthuge, Philip J Griebel, Le Luo Guan

Abstract

A diverse microbial population colonizes the sterile mammalian gastrointestinal tract during and after the birth. There is increasing evidence that this complex microbiome plays a crucial role in the development of the mucosal immune system and influences newborn health. Microbial colonization is a complex process influenced by a two-way interaction between host and microbes and a variety of external factors, including maternal microbiota, birth process, diet, and antibiotics. Following this initial colonization, continuous exposure to host-specific microbes is not only essential for development and maturation of the mucosal immune system but also the nutrition and health of the animal. Thus, it is important to understand host-microbiome interactions within the context of individual animal species and specific management practices. Data is now being generated revealing significant associations between the early microbiome, development of the mucosal immune system, and the growth and health of newborn calves. The current review focuses on recent information and discusses the limitation of current data and the potential challenges to better characterizing key host-specific microbial interactions. We also discuss potential strategies that may be used to manipulate the early microbiome to improve production and health during the time when newborn calves are most susceptible to enteric disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Master 41 17%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 71 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 28 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 78 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,098,127
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,681
of 6,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,253
of 274,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.