↓ Skip to main content

Looking on the Bright Side of Livestock Emotions—the Potential of Their Transmission to Promote Positive Welfare

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Looking on the Bright Side of Livestock Emotions—the Potential of Their Transmission to Promote Positive Welfare
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi Baciadonna, Sandra Duepjan, Elodie F. Briefer, Monica Padilla de la Torre, Christian Nawroth

Abstract

Emotions can be defined as an individual's affective reaction to an external and/or internal event that, in turn, generates a simultaneous cascade of behavioral, physiological, and cognitive changes. Those changes that can be perceived by conspecifics have the potential to also affect other's emotional states, a process labeled as "emotional contagion." Especially in the case of gregarious species, such as livestock, emotional contagion can have an impact on the whole group by, for instance, improving group coordination and strengthening social bonds. We noticed that the current trend of research on emotions in livestock, i.e., investigating affective states as a tool to assess and improve animal welfare, appears to be unbalanced. A majority of studies focuses on the individual rather than the social component of emotions. In this paper, we highlight current limitations in the latter line of research and suggest a stronger emphasis on the mechanisms of how emotions in livestock are transmitted and shared, which could serve as a promising tool to synergistically enhance the welfare of all individuals within a group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 19%
Psychology 9 9%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#949,036
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#215
of 8,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,974
of 348,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.