You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia/Neoehrlichia Agents in Terrestrial Wild Carnivores Worldwide: Implications for Human and Domestic Animal Health and Wildlife Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2018.00293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcos Rogério André |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 35 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,431,532
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,333
of 6,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,278
of 437,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#52
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.