You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development, Preliminary Validation, and Refinement of the Composite Oral and Maxillofacial Pain Scale-Canine/Feline (COPS-C/F)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giorgia della Rocca, Alessandra Di Salvo, Maria Luisa Marenzoni, Enrico Bellezza, Giovanni Pastorino, Beatriz Monteiro, Paulo Steagall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 24 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,026,894
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,551
of 6,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,413
of 342,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#84
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.