You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Administration of a Synbiotic Containing Enterococcus faecium Does Not Significantly Alter Fecal Microbiota Richness or Diversity in Dogs With and Without Food-Responsive Chronic Enteropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Pilla, Blake C. Guard, Joerg M. Steiner, Frederic P. Gaschen, Erin Olson, Dirk Werling, Karin Allenspach, Silke Salavati Schmitz, Jan S. Suchodolski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 22 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,949,373
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#929
of 8,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,617
of 352,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#23
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.