↓ Skip to main content

Differentiating Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans in Amphibian Chytridiomycosis Using RNAScope® in situ Hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differentiating Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans in Amphibian Chytridiomycosis Using RNAScope® in situ Hybridization
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2019.00304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Ossiboff, Anastasia E. Towe, Melissa A. Brown, Ana V. Longo, Karen R. Lips, Debra L. Miller, E. Davis Carter, Matthew J. Gray, Salvatore Frasca

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,801,591
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#767
of 8,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,055
of 351,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#17
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.