You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Reporting Guidelines for Animal Health Surveillance—AHSURED
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianna Comin, John Grewar, Gerdien van Schaik, Heinzpeter Schwermer, Julie Paré, Farouk El Allaki, Julian A. Drewe, Ana Carolina Lopes Antunes, Leah Estberg, Michael Horan, Francisco F. Calvo-Artavia, Abdurrahman Hassan Jibril, Marta Martínez-Avilés, Yves Van der Stede, Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou, Ann Lindberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Poland | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 15 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,546,315
of 24,162,843 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#665
of 7,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,933
of 466,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#15
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.