You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategic Priorities for Research on Antibiotic Alternatives in Animal Agriculture—Results From an Expert Workshop
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00429 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy Kurt, Nora Wong, Heather Fowler, Cyril Gay, Hyun Lillehoj, Paul Plummer, H. Morgan Scott, Karin Hoelzer |
Abstract |
The emergence, spread, and expansion of antibiotic resistance and increasing restrictions on the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture have created a need for efficacious alternatives that remains unmet. Prioritizing research needs in the development of alternatives is key to ensuring that scarce research resources are dedicated to the most promising approaches. However, frameworks to enable a consistent, systematic, and transparent evaluation of antibiotic alternative candidates are lacking. Here, we present such an evaluation framework. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,184,284
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#567
of 6,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,453
of 459,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#11
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.